When Your Boss is Afraid of His Boss
🎧 Prefer to listen? Listen to Mile Markers https://open.spotify.com/show/132NgyfsC8H3kJP61eYbTV
One of the strangest leadership dynamics I have ever worked inside sounded like this:
“I can take that to the CNO if you really want me to, but I can tell you it will not go well.”
Sometimes the message was that he had very limited access to her. Sometimes it was that he could add the issue to his one-on-one the following week. Sometimes the question came back with enough warning attached that I understood the real question:
Do you really want me to risk bringing this up?
After a while, the answer became obvious. Of course, I didn’t want my director to get punished for carrying a concern upward.
So the concern stayed where it was.
That is how concerns disappear somewhere between the people who see them and the people who can fix them.
When the bridge becomes the checkpoint
A director should function as a bridge between senior leadership and the managers closer to the work. Information moves up. Context moves down. Problems get translated, priorities clarified, and decisions improved because someone can see both levels.
But when the bridge becomes afraid of the destination, it starts functioning like a checkpoint.
Every issue gets inspected for danger before it moves.
Will she be angry?
Will this make me look difficult?
Is this worth using my limited access?
Can we solve it without bothering her?
Do I really want my name attached to this?
Eventually, the manager below learns the rules.
You stop bringing everything you see. You edit. You wait. You work around. You try to solve what you can without escalating—even when you should. Sometimes you even start protecting your own boss from the executive above them.
The organization may still claim to value candor. It may have an open-door policy. It may ask employees to “speak up.”
But the actual communication system is teaching something else.
Fear travels
Research helps explain why this matters. A 2025 Harvard Business Review article by Jan U. Hagen and Bin Zhao reports that middle managers feel less psychologically safe than both their bosses and their teams. That creates a serious organizational vulnerability because those managers are supposed to carry information between strategy and operations. The result is a dangerous paradox: the people closest to senior leadership may be filtering the very information senior leaders most need to hear. Harvard Business Review
Megan Reitz and Amy Edmondson have also written about what happens after speaking up goes badly: failed attempts can teach people to silence themselves in the future. Harvard Business Review2
A study conducted in a large healthcare organization described a related pattern as the hierarchical MUM effect—employees withholding bad news from supervisors—and found that empowerment and stronger leader relationships reduced that withholding. Sciencedirect.org
Silence is learned.
And it can be taught indirectly.
But so can courage.
I have worked with some truly exceptional CNOs—leaders who made it easier to bring problems forward, not harder. They did not need every conversation to be comfortable. They did need people to trust that honesty would be handled with maturity.
One of those leaders was Brenda.
If you want to see what this looks like from the other direction, read Brenda Made Me Do It: A Lesson in Leading Up, Down, and Through.
You do not have to punish me for raising a concern if I repeatedly watch my director brace himself before raising one. I can learn the risk by watching what happens to him.
Follow the information
Senior leaders may genuinely believe they are approachable. They may even be approachable—to the people who have direct access to them.
But that does not tell you what is happening farther down the organization. The real test is what happens to difficult information before it ever reaches you.
A few things are worth noticing:
Managers apologize before bringing bad news.
Issues are saved for rare one-on-ones because access is tightly controlled.
Leaders below you repeatedly say, “I’m not sure how she’ll take this.”
People discuss problems extensively with peers while avoiding the person who has authority to resolve them.
By the time senior leadership hears about a problem, it has already become expensive.
Middle leaders have work to do here, too. Fear is real but passing that fear downward multiplies it (very, very literally).
If you lead in the middle, your team should not have to calculate your boss’s mood before deciding whether a safety concern, staffing issue, operational risk, or uncomfortable truth deserves daylight.
Carry the information clearly. Separate fact from interpretation. Bring possible solutions when you have them. Choose timing wisely. Use judgment.
And when the issue truly matters, let leadership carry leadership risk.
Healthy organizations build routes through which difficult information can travel without being warped by fear.
If you keep discovering important problems late, look at the path the information had to travel. Somewhere along the way, someone decided the problem was less dangerous than the conversation.
Transformationship Leadership Group helps leaders examine those patterns, rebuild trust, and create communication systems where candor can actually survive. If your organization is ready to strengthen leadership across levels, we would be glad to help.
Comments