Loyalty Is Not Silence—The Kind of Love That Tells the Truth

I’ve enjoyed a lot of friendships and family relationships with people on the autism spectrum. There is nuance, of course. Every person is different. But there is one pattern I’ve genuinely come to love: directness.

I would bring jam-filled shortbread cookies to work and expect the range of responses—raving from some, polite appreciation from others, and then, flatly: “Nope. The inside is slimy.”

Not mean. Not dramatic. Just honest.

I’ve learned to receive that not as judgment of me, but as an accurate report of how that person experienced the cookie. No social padding. No pretend enthusiasm. Just clarity.

That same colleague might be the first to say, “That idea won’t work because ___,” or to question a new process when everyone else is nodding along. They might react strongly to changes in shared spaces. They may propose a more efficient system that disrupts the comfortable rhythm of the group.

And I’ve learned something: the absence of “Southern grace” in communication is not the absence of loyalty. Often, it’s the opposite.

I’ve learned not to take directness personally. Not to interpret it as approval or disapproval of me. It’s information. It’s feedback. It’s perspective.

There is something profoundly stabilizing about knowing that what someone says in the room is what they will say outside of it. There is something comforting about predictability. Direct communication can be surprising—but it can also be deeply trustworthy.

I want that kind of loyalty in my life.

I want my loyalty to be to truth, to goodness, to shared values—not to fragile egos or social choreography. I want to defend your intentions when you are not in the room. I want to say, “Give them a chance,” when someone makes a mistake. But I also want to be able to say to you, directly, “That wasn’t your best.”

Clarity is a better loyalty than blind allegiance!

Too often, we call avoidance “kindness.” We say, “I didn’t want to upset them.” Translation: I didn’t want to risk the relationship.

But protecting someone’s ego at the expense of growth is not loyalty. It’s passivity dressed up as virtue.

In marriage, loyalty doesn’t mean silently collecting resentments. In leadership, it doesn’t mean letting poor decisions slide because confrontation feels uncomfortable. On teams, it doesn’t mean smiling in meetings and venting later in the hallway.

Loyalty protects the relationship—not the ego.

I want to be the kind of leader, coworker, friend, and spouse who says, “Loyalty means I will be your anchor while you sort out your mess. I will stand here and remind you of the good you chose. I will defend your character when it’s misrepresented. And I will also tell you the truth when you drift.”

And I want to be receptive to honesty in the same way. To pause before defensiveness. To process before reacting. To ask, “Is there something here for me to grow from?” instead of, “How dare you?”

Directness without dignity is cruelty. But dignity without clarity is decay.

The people I want in my circle are those who appreciate honest expression. Those aligned with the goodness we’re trying to follow. Those willing to grow toward that goodness together—even when we disagree in the moment.

I don’t want friends who will follow me the wrong way out of loyalty. I want people who will say, “I love you too much to let you go there.”

The kindest relationships are the clearest ones.

And the most trustworthy loyalty is the kind that tells the truth.

If you’re building a team, a marriage, or a friendship circle, ask yourself this: Do we value agreement more than integrity? Or do we love each other enough to stay clear, even when it’s uncomfortable?

Lean into this. Practice it. Invite it. The relationships that are big enough for truth are the ones that endure.

🎧 Listen to the podcast: